The project is a product analysis of the camera project at the beginning of 2015, looking at the product form from various perspectives such as product function and information architecture, although it has been almost three years in the past, I still hope Buy email list to rethink these past paths. Once again, the process of rewriting is actually a process of rethinking "why did you do it at the time, think this way" , now if you redesign this type of product, how do you think, etc., or think from a higher experience perspective?
There are three types of analysis dimensions: status analysis, product analysis, and user analysis. Each category contains many dimensions. In other words, different roles will have different results when they do these three analyses. For example, when product managers do product analysis , the key dimensions are product functions, business models, marketing methods, etc. If interaction designers do product analysis, the focus is on information architecture, interaction jump methods, frame layout, hierarchical relationships, user habits, etc.; so different The granularity and dimension of character analysis are also different.
The analysis that defines the project at that time is more inclined to be from a design perspective (product designer). According to the definition of product managers and interaction designers in the current industry, it is not so simple to express, and the perspective of product designers is more appropriate.
The advantages are obvious, the function level is flattened, the setting properties are weakened, and the only setting is the auxiliary line switch in the "Photo and Camera" setting at the system level; easy to switch;
The efficiency of switching the front and rear cameras is low: the front and rear cameras are frequently switched, and they are placed in the upper right corner;
The functions are not rich enough, such as the beauty function;